Apple has warned developers for scarcely a year which apps should not use UDIDs, as well as which they will be rejected in a future. A deadline has eventually come upon UDID apps, as Apple only voiced they will reject any apps which operate UDIDs starting upon May 1st.
Another chapter upon Apple’s deadline, is which all apps contingency await a iPhone 5’s 4-inch arrangement too. Here have been a full records upon a deadline:
Using Identifiers in Your Apps
Starting May 1, a App Store will no longer accept latest apps or app updates which entrance UDIDs. Please refurbish your apps as well as servers to join forces with users with a Vendor or Advertising identifiers introduced in iOS 6. You can find some-more sum in theUIDevice Class Reference.
Make Your Apps Look Great upon a Retina Display and iPhone 5
Starting May 1, latest apps as well as app updates submitted to a App Store contingency be built for iOS inclination with Retina arrangement as well as iPhone apps contingency additionally await a 4-inch arrangement upon iPhone 5. Learn about scheming your apps by reviewing theiOS Human Interface Guidelines.”
Apple hosted a annual shareholder assembly currently during Apple HQ in Cupertino. There were a little large rumors yesterday which Tim Cook would make known a batch separate during a meeting, though which never essentially happened.
At this years shareholder’s meeting, all a house members were re-elected, as good as Tim Cook got 99.1% of financier approval. There were dual proposals put to opinion which Apple did not support, though both of those were struck down too.
The initial offer requested which all of Apple’s tip management team keep 33 percent of their association share until they retire. The offer unsuccessful after Apple endorsed a ‘no’ vote.
The second offer sought to need which Apple emanate a Human Rights Committee upon a Apple board. Apple endorsed a ‘no’ opinion upon which offer as good since a latest retailer formula of control already serves which purpose.
The shareholders assembly was more notable for a offer which wasn’t voted on. Prop 2 was ostensible to be voted upon by Apple shareholders, though a decider ruled in preference of Greenlight Capital’s David Einhorn idea which a offer be tabled, so Apple pulled it from a meeting.
Prop 2 would have authorised shareholders to opinion to devaluate a capability of Apple’s house members to emanate elite batch as good as send which energy over to shareholders. During a shareholders assembly Tim Cook reiterated again which he thinks Einhorn’s legal case opposite Apple is positively silly.
Apple has been historically variable about how it lets marketers as good as developers lane iOS users by apps downloaded from a App Store. After all of a remoteness concerns were lifted about a UDID device identifier behind in 2011, a improved resolution never presented itself.
Apple in a future introduced a own Advertising Identifier for iOS device tracking purposes, though marketers still adored a unique, permanent inlet of a UDID. The UDID worked so good since it was a device-specific identifier which could never be changed. Athough developers were technically criminialized from regulating a UDID to lane iOS inclination some-more than a year ago, many, most apps still operate a deprecated process today.
Apple is reportedly starting to reject apps which operate web cookies to lane user wake up in iOS. Could this meant a revived pull towards a Advertising Identifier again?
Mobile app developers regulating a record called “cookie tracking” (sometimes called “Safari flip-flop” or “HTML5 initial celebration cookies”) have been starting to have their apps deserted by Apple’s App Review team, we’ve listened from a couple of opposite attention sources.
While it’s not a same as enormous down upon a UDID, this function shows which Apple is starting to get some-more critical about enforcing a device tracking policies.
When a UDID was banned, mobile app tracking fragmented in to all kinds of opposite methods. Cookie tracking is only a single example. Eventually, Apple wants everybody to be regulating a own Advertising Identifier.
If you’ve had a horrible experience with Apple’s latest Maps app, you’re substantially concerned for Google to precipitate up as well as get Google Maps during a behind of onto your iPhone. The Google Maps app is reportedly in growth as well as should be ready for launch by a finish of 2012, yet a little people during Google contend they’re not confident which Apple will authorize a app.
According to a latest report, Google employees consider which Apple will reject a app once Google submits it for capitulation since Apple will wish to ”keep relocating brazen in an bid to have a patently defective product better.”
We consider this a finish imitation as well as which Google is leaking stories to a press so they can keep inspection upon Apple since they wish Google Maps upon iOS to have a rarely manifest launch.We won’t know a law during a behind of Google’s allegations for certain until Apple approves or rejects a app after this year though.
Sources during Google have told The Guardian that they’re many disturbed by a sort of mapping apps a App Store is now promoting.
“Specifically, they indicate to a miss of any mapping app in a “Find maps for your iPhone” territory of a App Store – permitted usually around iPhones or iPads – which operate a Google Maps APIs to call wirelessly for location, routing or point-of-interest (POI) data.”
There have been giveaway apps, such as Maps+, which operate Google Places APIs as well as Google Maps tiles to move Google Maps during a behind of to a iPhone, yet Apple hasn’t promoted them in a App Store. By regulating Google’s APIs those apps would give iOS users a lot of a functionality which a aged Google Maps app had prior to it was private in a refurbish to iOS 6.
With a troubles surrounding Apple’s latest Maps app, you would be repelled if a Google Maps were deserted during a app capitulation process. Even yet Google is their greatest rival, Apple’s mapping resolution is defective to Google’s yet it has a value of being oven baked in to iOS, so they should be means to benefit marketshare fast once it becomes a higher product.
Unfortunately, a App Store has turn home to thousands of feeble written copycat apps which try to float a coattails of alternative renouned titles. Such apps operate a identical name, look, description, as good as even idol to pretence business in to downloading. While Apple is good known for a difficult mandate it puts in place for third-party developers, most transparent ripoffs still conduct to trip by somehow.
It appears as yet Apple is starting to moment down upon copycat apps with some-more force. App Store submissions which uses icons identical to alternative renouned apps have been right away removing banned.
Benjamin Mayo, an iOS developer, shares a notice from Apple relating to a deserted app that’s “icon appears to be similar” to a renouned charge physical education instructor Clear. The deserted app in subject is called Clear Todo, a obvious ripoff of a strange Clear app.
Traditionally, Apple has directed transparent of safeguarding app trademarks which has resulted in a lot of copycat apps hitting a store.
It appears this process has altered as good as Apple is receiving a most some-more active role; rejecting apps which try to trick users by aping successful apps’ trademarks. In short, Apple is assisting to strengthen genuine developers from being ripped off. This is a great thing.
It’s now misleading as to either this latest process is being implemented opposite a house by Apple, or if this was a special case. Clear is a really high-profile iPhone app. Clear Todo was a transparent copycat as good (pun intended), whilst alternative apps might usually take a ubiquitous pattern of an idol or an app’s simple gameplay mechanic.
Apple should really be monitoring App Store app copycats some-more closely, so we’re anticipating which this is some-more than an removed incident.
Alfred uses concept set of keys shortcuts to let we poke for anything upon your Mac.
As OS X continues to turn some-more of a consumer-oriented height as well as reduction of a energy user-friendly environment, Apple is reportedly set to proceed enforcing latest discipline in a Mac App Store which will anathema apps which operate “hotkey” functionality.
Apps similar to Alfred have been means to give a user a concept complement hotkey which can be used to entrance a app anywhere in OS X. Starting upon Jun 1st, Apple will be prohibiting these kinds of system-wide facilities from creation their approach in to a Mac App Store.
TUAW has been told which Apple will be rejecting all apps with hotkey functionality starting Jun 1, in any case of either a latest facilities have been hotkey associated or not. Basically, if you’re building a single of those apps, an app which assumes we can still supplement hotkeys, don’t worry submitting it to a Mac App Store.
It’s not only press-to-switch apps which have been feeling a vigour of a future. Many cross-app scripting utilities as well as macro programs already can’t step feet in a App Store as well as will have to quarrel for a space upon your mechanism under Mountain Lion’s GateKeeper.
Apple has been pulling for developers to exercise a sandboxing policies in a Mac App Store given final year, as well as Jun 1st is a deadline for all submitted apps to imitate with a latest permissions. Apple doesn’t wish an app interacting with most of OS X given it wants a hazard of a confidence crack to be minimized. This is distinct from a commercial operation as well as selling perspective, given Apple patently wants a Mac to be a safest choice for a finish consumer. But is Apple unequivocally peaceful to scapegoat a core energy users for a suburbanized OS?
TUAW cites unknown sources as well as says which “Apple will concede hotkey apps which have been already in a Mac App Store prior to Jun to offer only bug fixes.” Any latest apps with hotkeys as well as cross-app scripting won’t have it by a Mac App Store’s front door.
Federico Viticci of MacStories reached out to multiform developers as well as couldn’t find any petrify justification suggesting a hotkey ban, though it’s insincere which a process will be enforced to one side Apple’s sandboxing mandate during a commencement of subsequent month.
It might. Evi, a Siri knock-off, has assumingly incited a little heads during Apple. we took a demeanour during Evi a couple of weeks ago. After a hilly begin with overloaded servers, a app staid down as well as has gotten some-more reliable, though still has a lot of bad reviews in a App Store. Evi is tasteful since distinct Siri, it does not need an iPhone 4S. Evi additionally uses a Nuance speech-recognition engine, only identical to Siri. Unlike Siri, Evi can’t correlate with Mail, Calendar or a Reminders app.
TechCrunch reports which William Tunstall-Pedoe, CEO of Evi developer True Knowledge, perceived a phone call Friday from Richard Chipman of Apple. According to a published report, Tunstall-Pedoe was told Apple was starting to mislay Evi from a app store since it was really identical to Siri. Apple is citing territory 8.3 of a App Store Terms as well as Conditions: “Apps which crop up confusingly identical to an existent Apple product or promotion thesis will be rejected.”
The debate has caused lots of people to download Evi, substantially not what Apple was anticipating for. Late currently there were a little indications which a dual companies have been negotiating a little ways to keep a app alive. We’ve reached out to True Knowledge for comment.